DPOS ONLINE

Bryan Enfinger

Active Member
Just curious about the new online look of the DPOS service and processed an old file. The generated report does not show the antenna model used. For the reprocessing of the old file, I did select the proper antenna model JAVTRIUMPH_2A NONE. The antenna height entered is 2.025m (including the adapter) for both instances of processing. The ellipsoid heights differ by 0.064m. I realize the new look is in a beta phase, I thought I would bring this up.
 

Attachments

  • log0227a_DPOS_030116.txt
    19 KB · Views: 346
  • log0227a_DPOS_062016.txt
    18.8 KB · Views: 321

Alexey Razumovsky

Well-Known Member
JAVAD GNSS
5PLS
1. File submitted 01.03.2016 returns EL HGT: 135.127(m). ANT NAME: JAVTRIUMPH_2A NONE. ANT HEIGHT: Vertical(ARP) - 2.025 meters
2. File submitted 20.06.2016 returns EL HGT: 135.191(m). ANT NAME: -Unknown- ANT HEIGHT: Vertical(ARP) - 2.025 meters
Height difference is 0.064(m).

Ai(antenna reference point to phase center distance) value is 0.050(m).
So Ai mismatching deals 0.050 (m). Antenna PCV (phase center variations) deals last 0.014 m.
 

Bryan Enfinger

Active Member
Thanks Alexey, I just wanted to make you aware that the generated
UPLOAD SCREEN 062116.jpg
processing report DOES NOT show the antenna model that was selected when the file was uploaded for processing. I just used the website again with the same file and the processing report still does not show the antenna model selected when uploaded. Attached is the screen image before submitting the file as well as the generated report that shows no antenna model selected.
 

Attachments

  • log0227a_DPOS_062116.txt
    18.8 KB · Views: 339

Bryan Enfinger

Active Member
I suppose you should have it if you archive any files submitted to DPOS. It's 14MB. I zipped it and rediced to 9MB, wont upload.
 

Jim Frame

Well-Known Member
The 2A thing is going to dog us for a long time. I'm still not convinced that OPUS handles it correctly, but I haven't had time to definitively test.
 

Dmitry Ostrikov

Active Member
JAVAD GNSS
Please re-submit the files to app.javad.com

Unfortunately Antenna Model field value was corrupted and defaulted to Unspecified in DPOS.

This issue has been fixed.
 

Bryan Enfinger

Active Member
Thanks Alexey and Dmitry! Attached are the two files, the original and the new one processed this a.m., millimeter comparison, both horizontal and vertical. My brother and I have the LS-Triumph package and also have the T2 with the basic options. He really enjoys the package. Far superior than any other package on the market. I also think Justin is very robust and probably best processor on the market from what I've seen using web Justin vs OPUS. I always try to post process with another name brand processor to very both DPOS and OPUS. DPOS always has a closer solution to my processing than OPUS. We are planning to purchase Justin when the funds become available. Thanks for the great products you have developed.
 

Attachments

  • log0227a_DPOS_030116.txt
    19 KB · Views: 330
  • log0227a_DPOS_062216.txt
    18.9 KB · Views: 361
Top