Joe Paulin
Well-Known Member
Stay tuned! Yet another major advancement to be announced for the TLS plus.
Very, very curious... can you give us a bit more to chew on??
Stay tuned! Yet another major advancement to be announced for the TLS plus.
Ok, what is it? We used to dream of lots of things. Give another hint.Stay tuned! Yet another major advancement to be announced for the TLS plus.
This was a screen shot of today’s test with the LS+. I am trying to dial down settings to see where it will end up storing a bad shot. On this test it still did not store a bad shot. It ran for 5 hours 50 min. It stored 148 shots. It had an average of just under 2 minutes per shot.
I am super impressed and am so glad I upgraded my LS.
View attachment 9898
I ran the points through DPOS and only had 1 point that came back that held the DPOS position. It was a bad fix. I had many other points that did not agree RTK-PPK. If I chose PPK for all points the statistics are terrible. Even the 50% is 2.81'.
Since you are running LS+ high-performance 4 engine RTK, I'm sure it's outrunning what DPOS can do even with four constellations.
DPOS deals about 30% of outliers on your project. All of them are 5-15 epoch solutions. DPOSed rover files are too small. In a case like this (middle canopy) PPK needs 1-2 minutes long observation.I ran the points through DPOS and only had 1 point that came back that held the DPOS position. It was a bad fix. I had many other points that did not agree RTK-PPK. If I chose PPK for all points the statistics are terrible. Even the 50% is 2.81'.
I am using a T3 base and T-LS rover, mostly 4 constellations/2 engine firmware the last month. I have been quite impressed with the RTK performance but the PPK results are often contradictory by several feet, even on some 10 minute plus occupations in various degrees of no-leaf canopy. I would say that my field procedures have confirmed the RTK DPOS results and disproven the PPK DPOS results on many such instances.V6 RTK performance has, with very few exceptions, always been superior to DPOS post processing. I agree with the theory that PPK should be better than RTK, but it has not demonstrated in my practice. I have found that MSM PPK has been superior to GPS + GLO RTK.
I am using a T3 base and T-LS rover, mostly 4 constellations/2 engine firmware the last month. I have been quite impressed with the RTK performance but the PPK results are often contradictory by several feet, even on some 10 minute plus occupations in various degrees of no-leaf canopy. I would say that my field procedures have confirmed the RTK DPOS results and disproven the PPK DPOS results on many such instances.
Below are screen shots of 3 examples from yesterday. I had to manually select the RTK version for point no. 800011