Done. Now the order of points is the same as order on "Points" screen for Alphabetic and Cronological sortings. "By Distance" is a bit different setting, I will add it in future.It's not the export order that I'm concerned about. It's the DPOS review screen,. The one you have from the DPOS window.
Otherwise, I wind up exporting to Carlson. Then, I use DPOS review to select either rtk or ppk, because I can figure out what/where that shot was. IF the DPOS review screen were in order, it would be a lot better.
The way it is now, with all the RANDOM sequencing, I slowly sequence it all. It's especially a pain if I shot one point 3x. One automatically goes rtk, and 2 go ppk, but they are scattered all over in the file. One is near the beginning, one is in the middle, and one is at the end. Can you imagine reading a book, after somebody randomly sequences the pages, AND the data on those pages? That's what I'm talking about.
I added long click for navigation buttons which makes pop-up menu with two items: 10 points after/before, first/last point.A button that sends you to the end of the sequence.
A button that scrolls 10 points at a time.
Unfortunatly I cannot make independ sorting safely without to make radical redesign. I am not sure that a good idea now, maybe in future.And, really, I see no need to make the settings the same on the DPOS points screen, as on the points screen. In fact, I'd prefer them to behave independently. Independent is better. If I sort by distance, in the points screen, then I don't want it to sequence the same on the DPOS screen. Leave them independent. This makes or allows DPOS screen to behave as a field book.