T3NR Promotion and Trade In Program

[Adam Plumley]

Hello JAVAD Forum,



In case you have not seen it we are running a limited time trade in promotion for the All New T3-NR.



More information is attached/below.

 

[Mark Wheeler]

Can this be used as a base?

 

[Adam Plumley]

Yes, it can be used as a base with an external UHF radio or a jetpack with a static IP.

 

[Jim White]

When will T3NR begin shipping?

 

[nusouthsc]

What are options for a controller?

 

[Adam Plumley]

Should be able to begin shipping units the first week of June.


The T3NR when used as a rover can be controlled with JMT on Android or IPhone. We have the Victor 2 handheld data collector and the Victor 4 tablet available if the user prefers a dedicated data collector instead of using a phone.

 

[Adam Plumley]

Data Collection | JAVAD GNSS

www.javadgnss.com

 

[Donald E Robinson]

Can it be use with the original Triumph LS

 

[Adam Plumley]

Yes, as a base it can connect to a jetpack with a static IP for TCP corrections or to an external radio for UHF corrections

 

[Donald E Robinson]

I just wonder if it is worth trading in my T2. I have had absolutely no issues with my LS, T2 or UHF. They are working flawlessly. I only use it on about 20% of my projects as most are too small to use GPS.

 

[Adam Plumley]

Folks, I am very sorry to say that I found out that the new products will not work as a base with J-Field. They have to be controlled with JMT.

 

[Shawn Billings]

I've used JMT to start my Triumph 3 quite a few times. It works well. It would be a little kludgy compared to using Remote Base, which is superior to any base setup ever made. But it works. Javad should include JMT with every receiver so that users have a utility to start the receiver, download files, and send files to DPOS and OPUS. All of which JMT is capable of doing.

 

[avoidthelloyd]

I've used JMT to start my Triumph 3 quite a few times. It works well. It would be a little kludgy compared to using Remote Base, which is superior to any base setup ever made. But it works. Javad should include JMT with every receiver so that users have a utility to start the receiver, download files, and send files to DPOS and OPUS. All of which JMT is capable of doing.

Will the LS be able to download the base raw data and DPOS like we are used to???

 

[Shawn Billings]

No that's where it gets kludgy. You would DPOS process through JMT then manually translate using M-Local in the points screen in the Triumph LS.

 

[avoidthelloyd]

No that's where it gets kludgy. You would DPOS process through JMT then manually translate using M-Local in the points screen in the Triumph LS.

No thanks!

 

[Adam Plumley]

Hi everyone, this is being addressed and is likely to be resolved soon. I will update as soon as I am certain the new products will work as a base with the LS and Jfield.

 

[Jesse Huff]

Hi All,

The use of the new products will absolutely be possible with the both of the new products. We had some communication about functionality get confused in translation, which was completely my fault. I wanted to put this out there for everyone, so that it was completely transparent that all this was solely miscommunication.

To put everyone's mind at ease, here are some screen pics showing the connection to a new T3-NR. Please forgive the off-center pics, I took these with my phone. (And ignore the elevation deltas... that's just me playing with datum differences.)

 

[Shawn Billings]

This looks like an old layout for base rover setup, prior to multiple output settings.

I'm not saying or insinuating that it's fake. Only that the layout is inconsistent with the current release and appears to be a step backwards.

Also T3NR can't be internal, which I'm sure is a simple bug in GUI.

 

[Jesse Huff]

This looks like an old layout for base rover setup, prior to multiple output settings.

I'm not saying or insinuating that it's fake. Only that the layout is inconsistent with the current release and appears to be a step backwards.

Also T3NR can't be internal, which I'm sure is a simple bug in GUI.

This is my (Tom's) old LS+, which was never updated to 4.0. What this should tell you is that we have consistency across the platform for J-Field to recognize Javad receivers, so thanks for pointing that out!

Also correct that it can't be internal radio, but I wanted to see if would cause any problems trying to set it that way, which it does not.

More info to follow on. Adam and I are going to do some testing with an external radio on Monday, just to confirm settings.

The overall message is that these new products will work with the existing system. (Even if it a previous release, too!!)

BTW, hope all is well, Shawn! Good to hear from ya!

 

[Adam Plumley]

Nice work Jesse!