Hi all,
We recently received our upgraded Triumph-LS+ and we have set up a quick comparison between the upgraded unit and our un-upgraded TLS.
We set up our Triumph-1M base station on our office roof with the following settings:
Protocol: simrx
Format: MSM3.2
Ch. Bandwidth: 12.5 kHz
Modulation: D8PSK
Both units were set up side-by-side under a tree by our office. The TLS+ is using the action profile suggested to us by Michael Glutting named "TLS+ Min2Eng Medium" except it is set up to auto-restart 1000 times. The TLS is using the standard "Boundary" action profile again set up to auto-restart 1000 times.
The idea is to see how many epochs both units record in the same amount of time, and what the horizontal spread looks like.
I will post in this thread again when we have the results of the test, but in the mean-time we're looking for suggestions as to other ways to compare the new and old units.
We recently received our upgraded Triumph-LS+ and we have set up a quick comparison between the upgraded unit and our un-upgraded TLS.
We set up our Triumph-1M base station on our office roof with the following settings:
Protocol: simrx
Format: MSM3.2
Ch. Bandwidth: 12.5 kHz
Modulation: D8PSK
Both units were set up side-by-side under a tree by our office. The TLS+ is using the action profile suggested to us by Michael Glutting named "TLS+ Min2Eng Medium" except it is set up to auto-restart 1000 times. The TLS is using the standard "Boundary" action profile again set up to auto-restart 1000 times.
The idea is to see how many epochs both units record in the same amount of time, and what the horizontal spread looks like.
I will post in this thread again when we have the results of the test, but in the mean-time we're looking for suggestions as to other ways to compare the new and old units.