Nate The Surveyor
Well-Known Member
As Galileo, and Biedou get closer to being available, I consider that there are 3 options to be available for a new base.
Right now, we can use T-1M.
Or the LS.
And, in the future, the T-3.
I can see an advantage of getting another LS, with internal radio. 1 watt. (Broadcasting)
If the new constellations prove to help only some, then I can use 2 rovers, with the T-2. This could improve many things.
If the new constellations help a lot, then the base having a LS on it, could simply speed things up. Later, a set of 3 LS's could form a dynamic setup, with 1 on base, and leapfrogging the other 2.
In any case, how hard is it to use an LS on base? Is it as automated as the T-2?
I just want to talk about it, for planning purposes.
What do you think?
Or, buy another LS for base, for now, and a T-3 later. This really could expand the usefulness of things.
Some other users also seem to favor the idea of an LS on base.
Nate
Right now, we can use T-1M.
Or the LS.
And, in the future, the T-3.
I can see an advantage of getting another LS, with internal radio. 1 watt. (Broadcasting)
If the new constellations prove to help only some, then I can use 2 rovers, with the T-2. This could improve many things.
If the new constellations help a lot, then the base having a LS on it, could simply speed things up. Later, a set of 3 LS's could form a dynamic setup, with 1 on base, and leapfrogging the other 2.
In any case, how hard is it to use an LS on base? Is it as automated as the T-2?
I just want to talk about it, for planning purposes.
What do you think?
Or, buy another LS for base, for now, and a T-3 later. This really could expand the usefulness of things.
Some other users also seem to favor the idea of an LS on base.
Nate