Nate The Surveyor
Well-Known Member
I have a T-2 on Base, 35 watt Radio, and an LS, working off my local base station.
I spent 30+ minutes, recently in the woods, getting one shot. It had some 39 groups, and finally I settled for a shot that had 22 epochs, and some 650 seconds of time. It may post process out. (PPK). We will see. But, There are times of the day, that the T-2 is all you need. It all runs like a million bucks. But, there are times of the day, when things lag.
No particular order to these questions, but they cross my mind, WHILE waiting for a shot. Here goes:
1.) When will the T-3 be ready, as a base station, for USA sats, Glonass sats, Beidou sats, Galileo sats, QZSS. and whatever Mexico is doing to get their Sat program going! Then, there's Starlink.
Well, whatever is going on, it's not here yet. However, we have not lost faith in Javad. I just take the position that there was alot to do. I'm guessing, that there will come a day, when 60 birds up will be common.
Next question.
2.) How good will it be? Will we be cooking with 40 sats up? will it be running like the T-2 does, when ALL things are going good? And, will it run that good, when we get it, or will it still take a few months to get it straightened out?
Next question.
3.) What will it cost, and can we buy it in one year, with 1st payment sent in, and and 12 equal payments?
Next question.
4.) Are you going to send it out with an EXTERNAL battery? 11 hrs seems like a bad deal. I wish they had made it a little bigger, and put 2 batteries inside. I can see me needing to hook up an external power source, IF I forget to charge. The LS having long battery life, was a VERY good idea. For a base station, being a little bigger, and having similar, or identical power (time) to the LS, seems like a "Good thing to keep going". Please include a "Pigtail" to hook up an external battery.
I hope you all in Research, Development, and Manufacturing are having a good day. Today, I'm learning to do Cross Sections, (I've done lots in the field, but not in a CAD environment, with ACAD.) And, of course, Mr Ashjaee, we are still blown away with what your gear does today.
Nate
I spent 30+ minutes, recently in the woods, getting one shot. It had some 39 groups, and finally I settled for a shot that had 22 epochs, and some 650 seconds of time. It may post process out. (PPK). We will see. But, There are times of the day, that the T-2 is all you need. It all runs like a million bucks. But, there are times of the day, when things lag.
No particular order to these questions, but they cross my mind, WHILE waiting for a shot. Here goes:
1.) When will the T-3 be ready, as a base station, for USA sats, Glonass sats, Beidou sats, Galileo sats, QZSS. and whatever Mexico is doing to get their Sat program going! Then, there's Starlink.
Well, whatever is going on, it's not here yet. However, we have not lost faith in Javad. I just take the position that there was alot to do. I'm guessing, that there will come a day, when 60 birds up will be common.
Next question.
2.) How good will it be? Will we be cooking with 40 sats up? will it be running like the T-2 does, when ALL things are going good? And, will it run that good, when we get it, or will it still take a few months to get it straightened out?
Next question.
3.) What will it cost, and can we buy it in one year, with 1st payment sent in, and and 12 equal payments?
Next question.
4.) Are you going to send it out with an EXTERNAL battery? 11 hrs seems like a bad deal. I wish they had made it a little bigger, and put 2 batteries inside. I can see me needing to hook up an external power source, IF I forget to charge. The LS having long battery life, was a VERY good idea. For a base station, being a little bigger, and having similar, or identical power (time) to the LS, seems like a "Good thing to keep going". Please include a "Pigtail" to hook up an external battery.
I hope you all in Research, Development, and Manufacturing are having a good day. Today, I'm learning to do Cross Sections, (I've done lots in the field, but not in a CAD environment, with ACAD.) And, of course, Mr Ashjaee, we are still blown away with what your gear does today.
Nate
