Recent content by giulio

  1. giulio

    Loss of performance, on a Job with screenshots

    I attach today's screenshots which highlight my problems with the RTN networks to which I connect my LS+ rover. I am in an urban area with a good view of the sky to the South and East. In fact I don't have positions I can trust and I go back to surveying with my old Navcom Sf3040, which only has...
  2. giulio

    Loss of performance, on a Job with screenshots

    but this value should not always be equal to zero (being the distance from the first mover). On my instrument it shows a measurement referring to a point where I had established a base about a year ago. I also always have these problems when I use the cadastral networks, as soon as I download...
  3. giulio

    Release Notes - 4.3.00

    Release Notes - 4.3.00, when for ls and ls +? Perhaps with a solution to Nrtk and modem problems.
  4. giulio

    update screen problem

    Thank, Update also solved for me which firmware and profile recommended for ntrip network connection with only GPS and Glonass
  5. giulio

    update screen problem

    New problem: the update screen is stuck at 30%, even turning it off by forcing a restart, once this has happened it always returns to the same point.
  6. giulio

    RTN Corrections - Antenna Height Reference Point

    perhaps it is for this reason that Rtpk differs from the Rtk solution by a value of approximately 5/6 cm, equal to the value of the offset of the rtn station antenna
  7. giulio

    problem LS+

    Josh, i had the same results as yours, in the open sky 360°, without obstructions, (with corrections from the RTN network with 4 constellations about 28 km away) many difficulties in fixing (times too long for the actual conditions). In less open areas the counter times faster....
  8. giulio

    problem LS+

    I repeat that the lack of detailed information makes us use our equipment inappropriately, I also had understood that autosetup, with the other option: no same frequency, would choose the best combination of constellation and frequencies for us. Now after more than a year we have understood (we...
  9. giulio

    problem LS+

    I'm trying different settings, a strange piece of data has been appearing for some time: I don't understand the distance shown in the penultimate line, it used to be the distance from the motor 1, now I don't understand where it comes from.
  10. giulio

    problem LS+

    In your test were you receiving corrections from a Javad base? I think that as you hypothesized, with corrections from other brands the signals there are more problems and it seems to me that a value lower than 60 is better. I will do further tests
  11. giulio

    problem LS+

    I sent an email to support asking if they can provide us with clarification, if so I will update you
  12. giulio

    problem LS+

    I did various tests and I noticed that by setting the max signal to 60 the engine has difficulty fixing by setting 40 it worked better, I'll try asking support and see what they reply.
  13. giulio

    problem LS+

    This is to use our equipment to 100% of its possibilities. We hope that technical assistance will regain the capacity it had in previous years and which differentiated it from other companies
  14. giulio

    problem LS+

    Matt, my opinion "no same frequency" should be the automatic option to ensure that the 4 engines do not use the same frequencies and constellations (what you suggest doing manually) which however does not work well with the current networks (I think because these do not have all the frequencies...
  15. giulio

    problem LS+

    But what is the option for: "No Same Frequency"? in Autosetup Strategy.
Top