Search results

Adam, Surveying takes us to some great places. I would say getting to survey in Pisgah is pretty sweet. You are a lucky dude. They also make some pretty darn good beer.

Thanks!

Thanks. This site is completely open and flat, coming in around 100 acres. So that helped! 2Hz Verify w/ V6 Reset Confidence Level @ 10 Consistency @ 5 Validate w/ @ least 2 engines 120 Epochs in the AM and PM before shutting down the base. As for the base (Points 100 and 101 of this survey)...

After making the changes that Matt suggested, I've attached the residuals of the adjusted vectors from both Point 100 and 101. I think this looks MUCH better! Thanks everyone!

No. I haven't run the new points yet. That is the data from the elevations being 0.37' low. Once I fix Day 2, I will add to the adjustment and post the results.

Adam, here is what everything looked like before Day 1 adjustment, after Day 1 adjustment and after Day 2 adjustment. Before Adjustment POINT ELEV 100 820.50 101 819.34 102 816.66 117 821.16 121...

Thanks for checking into this. I wonder why it applied the AHO on the first day, but not the second? I actually started a new job on Day 2 with imported, adjusted points. After Day 2, I did update all software before exporting the day's work. Does this come into play at all? 1. Would you mind...

You got it! Thanks.

My rover pole reads 4.92 all the way down (to compensate for Trimble's MT1000). But, the LS on this rod measures 4.55. Here is a picture of it. By the way, I am working with another crew on this job and they localized to the adjusted data from Day 1. They confirmed that everything checked...

Is it possible that the LS double applies the vertical height offset in the raw data? Here's what I found... T2-(HI) 2.0m + 0.025m adaptor LS-(HI) 4.92 -0.37 (Vert. Height O/S) to obtain a true 4.55' HI DAY1 1. Set Control Point 100 w/ RTN. 2. Set up T2 on 100 and collected static data while...

My sound failed in the last couple weeks. They said turn around would be about a week.

Thanks

Matt, How do you get to the 'ADD FIELD' screen (as you show above)?

Thanks everyone for the replies. I will try that suggestion Matt. IN does refer to their network as VRS. But, according to the IN Land and Aerial Survey Office, the mountpoint is actually the nearest base station (not a virtual station).

Hey folks, I am doing a test with INDOT RTN. So far, I have been able to export the G-file vectors from the network observations successfully. I have quite a few redundant measurements to adjust. From the raw data, how do you determine which CORS Base Station is being used by the LS? I need to...

Nate, Did you get the monopod with the double bubble?

Thanks!

Thanks! Two things, I suppose. 1. For OPUS, the correct Antenna Height is 2.025 (for JAVTRIUMPH_2A) on a 2.0m rod and .025m adapter? 2. WinTEQC does not provide an option for JAVTRIUMPH_2A. Is it best to leave antenna as 'NONE' in WinTEQC and confirm that the resulting, trimmed .15o file...

Hey folks. Does anyone know which antenna to select in WinTEQC for the Triumph 2. I'm chopping up a large static file into 1 hour sessions. The T2 was set on a 2.0m rod with the additional 0.025m adapter. Thanks!

I second Jim Frame. I would be willing to participate in a trade-in program too.