Antenna Height not correct

[James Suttles]

We recently did some rough grade staking. We came back to stake some other structures and we started using the Robot, and decided to check a couple of the rough grade stakes, just to be sure everything was the same. To our surprise, we are seeing basically 0.70' vertically. The horizontal was spot on.

After reviewing the points that were staked, noticed that the Antenna height, shows to be 6.069, so thought maybe we entered the HI incorrectly. After checking the screenshots, the HI was the correct height, but the Javad has somehow hardwired the 6.069 height. I have zipped up my project file so support can investigate what may be going on.

Here are screenshots, of one of the points, the collected point screen, and a screenshot of the version we are running. I just noticed today that an update is available, that may fix the issue, just trying to make sure something is not set in the unit.

Here is the link so support can download the file https://www.dropbox.com/s/e0bkl203vffwzmm/14512-211223 00_24_22.zip?dl=0

 

[Randy4591]

James, is that vertical height offset of 0.82 suppose to be there? That's got me a couple times.

 

[James Suttles]

Yep, we use a regular prism pole and that is the adapter height.

 

[Adam]

Shouldn't it be 0.082?

 

[James Suttles]

Your are correct, that's the issue. Good Catch.

 

[Wes Hand]

Off topic but I don’t think I’ve ever seen 4 fixed engines with a variety of 0.63.

 

[Adam]

It looks like it was NC rtn. Many places it is only gps, glo, gal. No bdu. Rtn with less than four constellation do not build variety the same as base rover with four.