Odd result

[Ralph Dominguez]

I spent a couple of days collecting data on 40 some points with my LS, using a couple of RTN points in southern California. I changed the RTN base a couple of times as I moved around and collected single points over those two days.
Nothing stuck out to me during this data collection and each session appeared to run it's course as expected.
Ultimately, I use Google Earth as a check to make sure my Lat/Long and Orthometric height are within reason.
One particular point, No. 17, appears to have a problem with the Orthometric height. I appears to be about 10 feet low. This was the first point collect on the second day. I have not revisited the site yet, but I will try to get to it in the next day or two to see if I can determine the issue.
I would appreciate it if someone would look at the data and let me know what the issue is.

I've tried to attach a dropbox link below:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/0idwxh4cbo1dsjc/ESLA SITES 2017-10-21 A-171026.zip?dl=0

Thanks,

 

[Jim Frame]

A quick-and-dirty look suggests that there may be more than just a vertical problem. I converted the JPS file to RINEX and processed it against GVRS, the nearest CRTN station. There's only 6 minutes of data and all I got was a float solution, but I'm getting differences of about 10 feet in the northing, a couple of feet in the easting, and about 10 feet vertical (low, as you suggested).

 

[Matt Johnson]

Your screenshot for this points shows that you are not using RTK Verification. Without using it and without using the default boundary profile there is some chance of accepting points with wrong fixed initiations.