Good morning everyone. I was hoping someone more knowledgeable than myself can confirm my my suspicions here or advise accordingly.
I've uploaded two extended DPOS reports for the same point. One has the antenna height set to "AUTO" and the other has it manually specified from the drop-down list as "JAV_TRIUMP-1 NONE" It appears in the extended report that DPOS is aware it is a Triumph 1 (or at least that's just reporting the name), but it doesn't take into consideration the antenna height. When I specify the antenna height manually the reported ortho elevation is ~0.30' lower, or roughly the 96mm measured in the NGS diagram between the ARP and the top of the unit (and I'm assuming pretty close to the gnss antenna.
Is this what's going on? Going forward it can be as simple as just specifying the antenna, but then "AUTO" might be a little misleading.
Thanks for any help or insight you might be able to provide.
Dylan
I've uploaded two extended DPOS reports for the same point. One has the antenna height set to "AUTO" and the other has it manually specified from the drop-down list as "JAV_TRIUMP-1 NONE" It appears in the extended report that DPOS is aware it is a Triumph 1 (or at least that's just reporting the name), but it doesn't take into consideration the antenna height. When I specify the antenna height manually the reported ortho elevation is ~0.30' lower, or roughly the 96mm measured in the NGS diagram between the ARP and the top of the unit (and I'm assuming pretty close to the gnss antenna.
Is this what's going on? Going forward it can be as simple as just specifying the antenna, but then "AUTO" might be a little misleading.
Thanks for any help or insight you might be able to provide.
Dylan