jack newsome
Member
What is the set up procedure for using the LS as a network rover?
that's what I'm thinking. Yet VT rtn specifically says it's reference frame is NAD83. I looked at my MN profile and I've set that to WGS84 a few years back (also a trimble network). Are all the Trimble rtn's broadcasting WGS84 while stating their reference frame is NAD83? The Leica rtn in NY states NAD83 and that's what I set the profile reference frame to. Seems to be different definitions of reference frame going on that could cause problems.It sounds like you have the wrong reference frame selected for the RTN profile. This RTN may be broadcasting WGS84 coordinates instead of NAD83.
Could it be one is US foot, the other is International foot?On related note, is there any reason I would need to use a different coordinate conversion to state plane in the collect screen when using rtn v base/rover? I set up to use VT rtn (trimble version) and picked NAD83(2011) for reference frame (same as when using base). Using base/rover I hit known points in VT state plane, but switching to rtn I get 3.5 feet difference.
The coordinate system I have the page set to is HTDP WGS84(ITRF2008) to NAD83(2011)/NAVD 88/SPCS83. Seems like a double correction, but why does it give me double correction on one and not the other when both base reference frames are the same?
Thank you! I didn't have the RTCM icon b/c it was set as default to radio corrections. Now that I changed it to Wireless LAN, I think I should be all set. Spent 4 or 5 hours trying to find that setting. No instructions in the manual, and nothing online through either videos or online manuals. With more and more people going to RTN correction streams, it might be something Javad may want to address for other future users.Setup for corrections is under the RTCM icon on the Home Screen now.
Lots of variables to good performance, but one thing to try is using single base when within 5 miles of CORS. There's a "nearest" option or you can pick individual stations.Thanks Matt. Got it working, but not getting the results I was expecting (barely fixed position). Got to be something not maximizing my settings. I've tried faster sampling rates. I'm using RTCM3MSM_IMAX under 50% open sky cover and the nearest CORS station is only 1.3 miles away.