Date for next release version of updates?

[Darren Clemons]

I think most or all the team is in San Jose at meetings this week. Hopefully more good stuff is coming soon . It's probably just awful having meetings out there in that weather!

There hasn't been a release version update in a long, long time and supposedly many things have been addressed such as some (maybe all) of the messy point numbering issues as well as moving/rotating/shifting batches of points where we don't have to input the range on every single different function.

Another thing I'm guessing must be coming soon is some kind of update to be able to run the smart tip. I've noticed it's for sale on the website but there's not anyway, I don't think, to even run it now on the LS in current release version. Is that correct?

Any discussion this week on revamping the bucket lists where we can toggle through the data or maybe change the weighting where it will always use the longest time for the bucket shown?

Also, I'd talked about a while back not having the ability to process any PPK data from a second or third rover running off one base. We've gotten to where we use multiple rovers quite often and the ease and functionality of PPK is so convenient it's tough now when we don't have it.

 

[Matthew D. Sibole]

I am not sure on when the next version will be pushed to the release branch.

The bucket list and the weighting of the epochs is something that has been worked on and we are still testing.

The smart tip software in Jfield is currently being worked on and will hopefully be ready soon (not sure how soon though).

The other items have been discussed on the private side of the forum and is still on the to do list.

 

[Nate The Surveyor]

One of the associated problems with this whole issue is to release updates that don't have bugs, crashes, and downright mathematical errors. The size of this task is big. I worked with another surveyor, in the past, to develop software, that was in development. I found bugs that he had never seen.
I sympathize with both sides here... the user that wants "It all", and the developer, who wants 100% reliability.
I'm waiting too!



Nate