Wes Cole
Active Member
I wasn't sure exactly where to post this, so I just stuck it under Triumph-LS/Victor-LS
Been testing short observations and processing them through DPOS lately. I've tested 5 minutes, 15 minutes, and 30 minute observations and haven't observed a significant difference between them, particularly in the horizontal. DPOS is far superior to OPUS in my opinion for several reasons:
I've also tested DPOS vs RTN values taken yesterday with the LS, with astounding results. Keep in mind these are in ideal GPS locations, open with little to no multipath. These are 200 second observations!! I processed the static file that was stored while taking the RTN shot.
Pretty incredible.
Been testing short observations and processing them through DPOS lately. I've tested 5 minutes, 15 minutes, and 30 minute observations and haven't observed a significant difference between them, particularly in the horizontal. DPOS is far superior to OPUS in my opinion for several reasons:
- it incorporates Glonass in it's solution
- you can get very good horizontal data in less than the 15 minute minimum OPUS-RS requires
- it will process data nearly immediately. i've noticed it's is almost negligible when waiting 1 or 24 hours to process. See comparison below of observations at 5/15/30 minute intervals, processed within 2 hours of the observation and processed +24 hours of the observation.
- OPUS doesn't have a sweet forum like this to brag about the results
I've also tested DPOS vs RTN values taken yesterday with the LS, with astounding results. Keep in mind these are in ideal GPS locations, open with little to no multipath. These are 200 second observations!! I processed the static file that was stored while taking the RTN shot.
Pretty incredible.
Last edited: