Is OPUS now down also?

[James Suttles]

I just tried to submit files to OPUS, and it just spins, like its uploading, but it never finishes. Trying to determine if OPUS is actually up or not.

Also, any ETR, (Estimated Time of Resolution) on DPOS in any flavor, Justin or Giodis?

Thx

 

[Kelly Bellis]

Yes, it's been doing a lot of that lately.
See last post here: https://support.javad.com/index.php?threads/dpos-is-not-working.5861/post-53565

 

[Shawn Billings]

Same. I can't process yesterday's base file. Might have to try Auspos or Canada's PPP. Both give results in ITRF so it'll require some effort to get it to nad83.

 

[James Suttles]

Wow, we are running out of options. I have used the others, when the Government was shut down, lol. That was years ago. Hopefully our crew get our solution back up soon. We have had so many advantages over the herd, I am fearful, that we are losing that edge, due to the loss of our counter parts across the pond.

 

[James Suttles]

Beta version of OPUS just gave back a solution, compared to another previous solution and it looks solid.

 

[Kelly Bellis]

Beta version of OPUS just gave back a solution, compared to another previous solution and it looks solid.

Could you share what software was used; e.g., SOFTWARE: page5 2008.25 masternnn.pl?

 

[James Suttles]

Here is the link:

OPUS: the Online Positioning User Service, process your GNSS data in the National Spatial Reference System

beta.ngs.noaa.gov

SOFTWARE: page5 2008.25 master42.pl 1603213

A second one, was ran and this is the result. This one yielded a vertical of about 0.03' difference. It was a different day, and both files are 24 hours @ 30 sec. Intervals.

SOFTWARE: page5 2008.25 master43.pl 1603213

 

[Kelly Bellis]

That's not what I meant. In the email from opus@ngs.noaa.gov with OPUS solution: in the subject, and down on the 15th line, there ought to be the software version:


NGS OPUS SOLUTION REPORT
========================

All computed coordinate accuracies are listed as peak-to-peak values.
For additional information: https://www.ngs.noaa.gov/OPUS/about.jsp#accuracy

USER: DATE: June 14, 2023


SOFTWARE: page5 2008.25 master43.pl 1603213

 

[James Suttles]

RINEX FILE: log01640.23o TIME: 20:44:11 UTC


SOFTWARE: page5 2008.25 master43.pl 1603213 START: 2023/06/13 00:00:00
EPHEMERIS: igu22662.eph [ultra-rapid] STOP: 2023/06/13 23:59:00
NAV FILE: brdc1640.23n OBS USED: 63990 / 66029 : 97%
ANT NAME: JAVGRANT_G3TJ NONE # FIXED AMB: 233 / 245 : 95%
ARP HEIGHT: 0.000 OVERALL RMS: 0.015(m)

and

RINEX FILE: log01620.23o TIME: 20:36:02 UTC


SOFTWARE: page5 2008.25 master42.pl 1603213 START: 2023/06/11 00:00:00
EPHEMERIS: igr22660.eph [rapid] STOP: 2023/06/11 23:59:00
NAV FILE: brdc1620.23n OBS USED: 63458 / 65424 : 97%
ANT NAME: JAVGRANT_G3TJ NONE # FIXED AMB: 197 / 204 : 97%
ARP HEIGHT: 0.000 OVERALL RMS: 0.014(m)

Is that what we are looking for.

 

[Kelly Bellis]

Yes, thank you. The software version spit back from your submission using the beta OPUS site looks similar to what's used on the regular OPUS submission site. Small differences between your example may exist, e.g., master43.pl and master42.pl, but page5 2008.25 is still the same versioning we see from their "production" OPUS tools. If I recall correctly, the two different perl scripts may be implicit of the server each are on, but I can't swear to it.

 

[Kelly Bellis]

Also note, small differences in the solutions may in part be due different orbital products that were used.