New dpos, with static, and kinematic

Nate The Surveyor

Well-Known Member
Shawn billings let on about it.
Brings some things to mind.
Will this lead to saving data at the base, at a 1 second rate?
(I'm wiggling in my seat!)
Nate
 

Matt Johnson

Well-Known Member
5PLS
Shawn billings let on about it.
Brings some things to mind.
Will this lead to saving data at the base, at a 1 second rate?
(I'm wiggling in my seat!)
Nate

DPOS will be able to process the Base to Rover vectors in the future. So yes, the Base data will need to be recorded at a 1 second period for this to work well.
 

Shawn Billings

Shawn Billings
5PLS
Also, kinematic isn't on the table right now, and I don't know if it will be in the future. Right now we're looking at a static vector from base to rover. Fast static might be a better term although I'm not sure that there is a functional distinction between static and fast static.
 

Nate The Surveyor

Well-Known Member
My first post with a new (used) laptop. I was down a week.
I'm pretty stoked about this new development.
To be able to log static, means, alot to us, as surveyors.
I bought a laptop, to use with the LS, in the field. I'll be needing another office computer.
Any idea how long it takes to download 8 hrs, of data, from base to LS, in the field? (@ 1"rate)
 

Shawn Billings

Shawn Billings
5PLS
You can just leave the base and LS on in your car after you pack everything up and let it download while you drive. Updated firmware is being worked on to increase the Bluetooth transfer speed.

That's what I always did if it was going to be a lengthy download. It never was an issue, I just needed to remember to turn off the Triumph-2 when I got back to the office.
 

Shawn Billings

Shawn Billings
5PLS
Aren't these vectors already solved in the RTK process? Don't they form the basis of the gfile export?

Yes, generally.

This will allow users to process vectors if they lose communication between base and rover (range, interference, terrain, etc.) It won't always be the best solution, particularly if you have many points to collect without communication to the base. For those cases, it will likely be more efficient to move the base or set up a repeater. It should be a great utility for getting that one or two shots that are just beyond radio range, without requiring a relocation of the base or repeater.

It may also be useful for improving RTK vectors using a more superior post processing algorithm. But that remains to be seen until it is implemented.

Primarily Hybrid RTK will provide a highly automated approach to what Trimble refers to as "infill". Javad's approach will not require users purchase additional software, nor even downloading to a PC. Like DPOS in J-Field, it will be available entirely within J-Field. Unlike DPOS, Hybrid RTK will process the vector from base to rover even if the CORS data for determining the base position is unavailable, meaning this processing could be accomplished in the field if necessary.

The user would return to the base, stop and download the base raw data file and submit both to DPOS/Hybrid RTK. The returned vector would be applied to the standalone point in the J-Field database.
 
Top