Trajectories and an ATV

John Thompson

Well-Known Member
I collected some trajectories with my ATV on Friday. Wide open skies. I had these settings selected:
8870


I meant to set Traveled Distance to 25 feet, and didn't notice it was 250. The points were dense enough though because Horizontal Off-Line was set to 2. I think I normally use 5 or 10, but it was set to 2 and I left it. In many places the trajectories look like this:
8871

The zigs are about 2.5 feet long. Total length shown here is 77 feet.

What caused these zigs? Does the LS compensate for tilts while collecting trajectories? I wonder if the roughness of the ground caused an oscillation with the tilt compensator. The ride sure didn't feel that rough. This particular section was pretty flat and smooth.

I generated contours from these points and they look correct.
 

Michael Stazhkov

Developer
JAVAD GNSS
I collected some trajectories with my ATV on Friday. Wide open skies. I had these settings selected:
View attachment 8870

I meant to set Traveled Distance to 25 feet, and didn't notice it was 250. The points were dense enough though because Horizontal Off-Line was set to 2. I think I normally use 5 or 10, but it was set to 2 and I left it. In many places the trajectories look like this:
View attachment 8871
The zigs are about 2.5 feet long. Total length shown here is 77 feet.

What caused these zigs? Does the LS compensate for tilts while collecting trajectories? I wonder if the roughness of the ground caused an oscillation with the tilt compensator. The ride sure didn't feel that rough. This particular section was pretty flat and smooth.

I generated contours from these points and they look correct.
Do you have recorded GNSS file for the trajectory? Could you "Send Project to Support" (button on the Projects screen).
 

John Thompson

Well-Known Member
I sent another project to support. (Wauneta-SN229) I made two trajectories over the same area, with and without correcting for tilts. Both had settings like this:
8998

Ignore the first (short) trajectory. The second one had tilt compensator ON and the third had tilt compensator OFF.

With the tilt compensator ON, there are several places where the trajectory stored multiple points in rapid succession, caused (I think) by the tilt compensator. The trajectory with the tilt compensator off looks ok to me.

Points to check:
DefTag182-192
DefTag1117
DefTag1234
DefTag1284
DefTag1362-1365
DefTag1388
DefTag1426
DefTag1453-1456
 

Adam

Well-Known Member
5PLS
I prefer to have tilts off for trajectories. Your elevation will be off about a tenth at about 10 degree tilt. Thats assuming the ground is flat and you have one side of the atv jacked up. When the ATV is tilting because its on a slope the LS tilts as well and the LS almost always tilts downhill. Because of that the elevation will be even closer to correct. The ground is falling away in the direction of the tilt.
8999
 
Top