Just to be certain we are discussing the same conditions. When I say network I am referring to a network service that provides real time corrections
One more quick point.
If we are using a UHF radio, we have the option of transmitting corrections at 1 Hz, upsampling the data on the LS at 5 Hz. This will provide essentially the same performance as Beast mode in terms of data quality and survey time. The advantage of this is decreasing the radio's modulation. It will allow greater range/penetration, decrease battery consumption and decrease heat output.
I haven't verified this however; it looks like performance is as strong as having true 5 Hz processing.
I will add that having your own base is almost always better than using a network. You lose so many advantages that DPOS and Hybrid RTK bring to the table, when you rely on a network.
So have you successfully upsampled the NC RTN to 5 hz?Upsampling works well with UHF, extending range and reducing strain and heat on the radio. Also It conserves battery life. It also enhances network use.
Yes, everything you said is correct. Upsampling provides the same performance as 5 Hz corrections. I have tested it with an external GNSS antenna split to feed 2 LS's, one with receiving 5 Hz corrections and the other upsampling 1 Hz corrections to 5 Hz, there is no detectable difference.
It does beg the question, though, if it doesn't make a difference, does it offer any material advantages? I gave it a quick try this afternoon, and the most notable thing I saw was that the 10 verification epochs happened in about 2 seconds, as expected. So verification is being done with an extrapolated solution, yes? I'm not sure that's a good thing. Is there a way to change the number of verification epochs with V6 Verify?
It's always been editable.