T3NR Promotion and Trade In Program

Jim Campi

Jim Campi

Active Member
Adam, has the 3-NR or 1M plus been tested as a base in a RTK configuration (base and rover, no network corrections)?

I am going to need a new base to replace my T2, soon. Say 4-8 weeks max, hopefully sooner. I know there was talk about having to test this feature and possibly reconfigure or reprogram the unit. We all know how easy it is for a deadline to show up, seemingly unannounced,

If more testing and reconfiguration is required, do you expect there will be an issue with receipt in the next 6-8 weeks?

Thanks!

Side note it appears that the promo for the 1m+ has changed??? We are no longer required to trade in a receiver with an internal radio? That means the T2 qualifies for the $2k trade in value? The 1M+ seems to be a much better unit.

Jim
 
Adam Plumley

Adam Plumley

Active Member
JAVAD GNSS
The promotion for the new products hasn't changed.

We are offering the T1M+ for $9995 and allowing $2000 for the trade of any multiconstellation rtk reciever with either a cell modem or radio modem. With trade, $7995.

We are also offering the T3 discount to existing customers who would like to upgrade to a newer base. This offer doesn't require a trade in.

Currently, the T1M+ and T3NR will not communicate with JField. This is being worked on but I'm not sure how long it will take.
 
Jim Campi

Jim Campi

Active Member
Matt Sibole said:
Mark, To be honest, I am not sure. I have not used anything with an IMU. The T3NR has one but the firmware is not ready for that to be turned on yet. I will keep you posted.
Click to expand...
Hi Matt, when we went from 1Hz to 5Hz collection rates in beast mode, it made a significant differance in time on site. Other than the hardware development, what is preventing the system from running at a kHz, MHz or GHz. A 15 min occupation at 1 hz would take less than a second at 1 kHz. Now that would be worth a few extra bucks.

Is this aspect of chip development not following Moore's law? Is there some other reason why we need the actual time occupying the point rather the proper number of epochs?

In my view, one of the most important improvements that can be made to the system is decreasing time onsite.
 
M

Matt Sibole

Member
JAVAD GNSS
Jim Campi said:
Hi Matt, when we went from 1Hz to 5Hz collection rates in beast mode, it made a significant differance in time on site. Other than the hardware development, what is preventing the system from running at a kHz, MHz or GHz. A 15 min occupation at 1 hz would take less than a second at 1 kHz. Now that would be worth a few extra bucks.

Is this aspect of chip development not following Moore's law? Is there some other reason why we need the actual time occupying the point rather the proper number of epochs?

In my view, one of the most important improvements that can be made to the system is decreasing time onsite.
Click to expand...
Jim,

These things are up to product development of which I am not a part any more. I am just testing things that have been released to me for testing purposes.
 
W

Walter Killion

New Member
ZTkowasz said:
Matt,
What tablets are you running JMT on? In your experience does it require a lot of processing speed and ram? I’ve been looking at Samsung galaxy’s, the A7 lite is inexpensive and would keep the weight down, just not sure if it’s “enough” tablet for it. Would something like the active3 be a better fit?
Click to expand...
We have a mix across the Lower Mississippi Gulf. Alabama and Arkansas Galaxy Tab A7's lites and Mississippi and Tennessee Tab Active 4 pros.
 
Jim Campi

Jim Campi

Active Member
I have a copy of JMT for iOS that I downloaded when I aquired the T2 years ago. That version does not work with the T3-NR?
 
M

Matt Sibole

Member
JAVAD GNSS
JMT for IOS is more for sending OPUS/DPOS files to the servers. It is not the collection/stakeout style app that the Android version is.
 
Adam Plumley

Adam Plumley

Active Member
JAVAD GNSS
Friends, I have good news!

We have a version of J-Field that works with the T3NR as a base with TCP over Wifi and External UHF.

Hats off to the engineering team.

BASE-SETUP_20230713-10.18.37.png
STATUSBAR-ROVER-CORRECTIONS_20230713-10.18.55.png

BASE-SETUP_20230713-10.18.44.png

STATUSBAR-ROVER-CORRECTIONS_20230713-10.19.18.png
 
Adam Plumley

Adam Plumley

Active Member
JAVAD GNSS
Greg,

I have one coming to test with. I don't see why it wouldn't. J-Field was the reason it wouldn't before. Now J-Field has been corrected. I'll definetly post here when I have tested it.
 
ZTkowasz

ZTkowasz

Member
Jim Campi said:
Adam is the T3-NR available or out of stock etc. I will probably purchase in the next 2-3 weeks.
Click to expand...
I ordered one early last week, my order status went from manufacturing to unit testing by the end of the week, but has not shipped. Seems like order fulfillment will be fairly quick, but it’s not a “on the shelf ready to go situation”
 
Adam Plumley

Adam Plumley

Active Member
JAVAD GNSS
Right now its taking a little over a week. They are built and on the shelf but before the receivers go out the factory performs all the final testing and preparations.

Zach, I think you should get yours this week.
 
Adam Plumley

Adam Plumley

Active Member
JAVAD GNSS
Hey Everyone,

We have fixed the communication compatibility problem with the new products and J-field. We have a J-Field version that I have tested and was able to use the T3NR and the T1M Plus as bases for the LS. This version is in testing and should be released soon.
 
D

DUANE WETMORE

Member
Matt,
Will upgrading from a T1M 4 constellation to the T1M+ provide any significant improvement in canopy?
Also a recent post hinted that the T1M+ has a 2 watt UHF radio?
Does the T1m+ trade in promo need to be 4 constellations or does GPS + GLONASS qualify, such as a T1?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top