Nate The Surveyor
Well-Known Member
I came through the first time, and shot a 3/4" rod in concrete I shot it twice. It gave me 2 coordinates that were 0.04' apart. (It was an obvious marker) After localizing, and such, It told me to look 0.30' to the NE. of it. So, I dug down, and FOUND the actual survey mark, a 5/8" rod.
So, I shot 5/8" rod twice. Now, I have 4 points real close to each other. The LS is treating all 4 as ONE POINT. So, I reduced the CLUSTER AVERAGE down to 0.08', and deleted avg points, and re made them.
Solved.
However, is there a way to tell the LS, that any pile of repeat shots are ONE point, and another pile thats real close is ANOTHER point? I can see it would be handy to be able to differentiate points for cluster average?
It's not super important, but I can see this as a potential source of minor error.
Thanks
Nate
So, I shot 5/8" rod twice. Now, I have 4 points real close to each other. The LS is treating all 4 as ONE POINT. So, I reduced the CLUSTER AVERAGE down to 0.08', and deleted avg points, and re made them.
Solved.
However, is there a way to tell the LS, that any pile of repeat shots are ONE point, and another pile thats real close is ANOTHER point? I can see it would be handy to be able to differentiate points for cluster average?
It's not super important, but I can see this as a potential source of minor error.
Thanks
Nate