Please participate to the poll.
Agree, but that is okay for this question, I think. I would rather wanted to see percentage distribution for two solutions. Actually I had to link this question to the field application to not mix them up. Let us see results and I may create another survey.I can see the advantages of both. You're going to get some skewed market research asking that question of this crowd.
Not necessary, at least not sensitive in use, I believe.Would the overall weight go up this way?
Correct, the point was not about what we have now, but about what is more handy for their applications. Honestly, I had to divide people by markets and ask this question separately in each group, but I did not mean this specific at the moment of poll creation. I do understand that majority of active users are Triumph-LS users and results may be obvious, but I hope to hear non Triumph-LS users too. Or such comments like you shared here.I see some crazy voting here.
I understand that voters love Triumph LS but this device exists already and you can purchase it now. So what is the point to clone it?
In general discussion in regards of future receiver, it's a question of flexibility given to users. With separate controller, especially Android powered, users have choince and they are able to upgrade easily whenever they want to or they are forced to.
You want to use a small smartphone or maybe some big screen table, you can do it. Your controller is dead suddenly, lets use phone from your pocket to finish job. Or maybe there are a bunch of guys in one office that just swap one receiver every other but they want to use own controllers to keep custom settings and data in separation. Those are real life examples.
And this is the key.
Well, I vote here against all in one device with both my hands.